From: Abhisak Chulya (abhisak@wwtld.org)
Date: Sat Mar 08 2003 - 06:46:06 ICT
Thanks very much, Stephan for pointing that out. We should lift that
requirement.
Regards,
Abhisak
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephan Welzel/Denic [mailto:welzel@denic.de]
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:47 AM
> To: abhisak@wwtld.org
> Cc: cctld-adcom@wwtld.org; cctld-discuss@wwtld.org;
> cctld-sec@wwtld.org; nameserver-discuss@wwtld.org; nameserver-ws@wwtld.org
> Subject: Re: [cctld-discuss] Grant Announcement for ccTLD Name
> Server Training inRio
>
>
>
> Hi Abhisak,
>
> On 03.03.2003 09:16 "Abhisak Chulya" <abhisak@wwtld.org> wrote:
> >
> > ccTLD Name Server Training will be held in Rio de Janeiro,
> Brazil on 21 - 22
> > March 2003. There will be a grant for airfare of $500 (maximum
> or actual
> > fare applied) for ccTLD Managers or staff. Priority will be
> given to all
> > ccTLDs in Latin American region. Participants must find your own
> > accommodation. If there is fund left, the grant will then be given to
> > others based on the following requirements:
> > - never been to ccTLD meeting and Name Server training
> > - ccTLDs from developing nations
> > - startup or small ccTLDs with less than 10,000 names
>
> With regard to the issue at hand it probably doesn't matter much
> but nevertheless
> importance needs to be attached to the assertion that the number
> of domain names
> registered with a registry is _not_ an indicator of this
> registry's economic well
> being.
>
> We had this discussion at ccTLD meetings several times and I'd
> like to emphasize
> that there are registries which have very restrictive rules and
> charge high fees
> whereas others have liberal rules and charge low fees. The former
> kind of registry
> is likely to have way less domain names registered than the
> latter but will at the
> same time be significantly wealthier.
>
> I thus suggest a different indicator be chosen in future like,
> for example, the
> revenue per registered domain name.
>
> Best regards,
> Stephan
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue Apr 08 2003 - 19:23:03 ICT