[cctld-sec] RE: .td correct email for ccTLD admin contact

["Abhisak Chulya" <abhisak@wwtld.org>]

Yann,

All I can do now is to send the ballots again to .bi and .rw.  But for the
others that have different email addresses, I can not bend the rules here.
If I allow those five ccTLDs, what about others that have bounced emails.  I
don't want to open a new can of worms.  I understand your point clearly that
we don't have enough participants. And both IANA and ccTLD sec. got the
updated info but have not posted in IANA database.  I think we have to
change this rule at LA meeting.  I am sorry, Yann.  As much as I wanted to
change, I really appreciate for what you have tried to help those ccTLDs as
a regional organization.  And this is a great example.

I will definitely raise this issue in LA meeting.

Best regards,
Abhisak

-----Original Message-----
From: Yann Kwok [mailto:yann@netbox.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2543 1:46 AM
To: Abhisak Chulya; quaynor@ghana.com
Cc: Kent Crispin; Kanchana Kanchanasut
Subject: RE: .td correct email for ccTLD admin contact


Abhisak,

> As I mentioned to you in my last email that we can not change
the email of
> Admin Contact.  The Election proposal stated that we have to
follow IANA
> who-is database.  We can't just change the email addresses and
send them
> ballots to new addresses. The change must be done at IANA
first.  We will
> have to discuss this matter in LA meeting.
>
> What we can do is we update our own database for voting
purpose in case that
> at LA meeting we decide to modify the Election proposal.

The requests I've been sending you are the actual current ccTLD
admin contacts. In most cases, they are the same persons, with
updated mail addresses. They should have also sent the ccTLD
template to IANA for updating their records, which is why I've
copied IANA on the mail.

My question is:

Both IANA and the ccTLD secretariat now have the updated admin
contacts. Can the ballots be sent again to them so that those
countries can be allowed to vote ? Kent should have clearly
received bounced emails from those countries below. Given how
few candidates vote, these voters can make a significant
difference, and I'm requesting that they should receive the
ballot again. If you want, we can confirm with Louis as to
whether he've received the updated information.

Country	Previous address	Correct address

.ao	jteta@rccn.net			jteta@diee.fe.uan.ao
.bf	tankoano@DELGI.BF		joachim.tankoano@delgi.gov.bf
.dj	brunet@intnet.dj		amh@intnet.dj
.km	mgomri@FCR.FRANCETELECOM.FR	mgomrio@snpt.km
.td	tit@fcr.france-telecom.fr	tarouss@intnet.td

The admin contact from .bi and .rw also said (copy below) that
according to his logs, he didn't receive the ballots, and
requested that the ballots be sent to him again. In this case,
it is the same e-mail address.

Could Kent send the ballots for them again ?

Thanks and Regards,

- yann

------- Forwarded message follows -------
From:           	"NIC Congo Administrator" <admin@nic.cd>
To:             	<yann@netbox.com>
Subject:        	Re: ccTLD Elections
Date sent:      	Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:18:33 +0200
Organization:   	NIC Congo

Bonjour

Je viens de me rendre compte de l'erreur de dispatching dans mes
tables de mail.

Il apparait que certains mails vers admin@nic.rw et nic.bi ne
sont pas parvenus à leurs destinataires.

Vous serait il possible de les réexpédier dans environ 3 heures
?

Merci de votre patience.

David


----- Original Message -----
From: "Yann Kwok" <yann@netbox.com>
To: <admin@nic.cd>
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 10:41 AM
Subject: ccTLD Elections


> Bonjour David,
>
> Un courriel de <ballot@vote.songbird.com> a ete envoye pour
les
> elections des ccTLD.  Est-ce que vous pouvez confirmer si vous
> avez bien recu le mail ?
>
> J'espere avoir votre support. Merci !
>
> - yann

------- End of forwarded message -------

--
ccTLD Constituency of the DNSO
Secretariat Mailing list