[cctld-discuss] RE: ccTLD funding models
greetings. Thank you for your inputs- however, I do not see the country names or 2 letter codes- what are they? peter de Blanc .vi -----Original Message----- From: Norbert Klein [mailto:norbert@forum.org.kh] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 3:04 PM To: tld@aptld.org; cctld-discuss@lists.wwtld.org Cc: Chon Kilnam; Kanchana Kanchanasut; pdeblanc@usvi.net Subject: ccTLD funding models Some consideration for the calculation of Suggested Contributions by ccTLDs: The following is based on data about 14 ccTLDs in the Asia-Pacific region. Data collected were 1. Annual registration fee for a domain in US$ 2. Total number of domains registered (multiplied these two figures yield an income figure) 3. GNP per capita in US$ from an international magazine In the course of the previous discussions it had been also assumed that the Annual Domain Registration Fees in the different countries reflect the economic situation in these countries. This does not seem to be the case: most fees are in the range of US$20 to US$35, quite unrelated to the GNP per capita figures for these countries which vary from US$225 to over US$30,000. I have calculated three models in an Excel table, so that ways could be found that ccTLDs in countries with less economic resources could be allowed to pay lesser fees, based on a transparent formula: A – Suggestions according to a GNP factor B - Suggestions according to a slightly flattened GNP factor C - Suggestions according to a strongly flattened GNP factor A – the full GNP/capita figure is brought into the calculation. While this may seem to be a very just sharing of burdens by he strongest, it does not challenge others to consider their own possibilities. B – a middle way between A and C, but it does not request the ccTLDs in the economically middle level GNP countries to make substantial efforts. C- while supporting the very small ccTLD by a low contribution and asking a lot from the larger members (though not so much in terms of percentage of their income), it tries to allocate fair shares to all. What a fair share is, is of course not commonly defined. I suggest Model C for serious consideration to be adopted (though it can be modified in many ways). I have assumed a total target figure of US$100.000 for these 14 countries, but the Excel table allows of course to add more countries, and to modify the total target figure by an adjustment factor, while maintaining the basic relationship between the different suggested contributions. As a result, the annual fees per ccTLD, in Model C, would vary between no charges for a small and economically very weak country where domain names are registered free of charge as a method to strengthen the presence of domains from this country on the Internet, to US$100 for a number of countries with less than 1000 registered domains, over several hundred or several thousand US dollars, up to US$42.000 (corresponding to 0.01% of the estimated income from the large number of domains registered under this ccTLD. First of all I want to thank those ccTLD Administrators who kindly made relevant information available to me. Secondly, I have to add some words of caution: neither are all data which I collected fully compatible (as there exist different payment schemes for different types of domains registered – commercial, non-commercial etc.), and also there are different time periods for which fees have to be paid for registered domains with different prices (first year/maintenance fee, once for all payments etc.). I had to enter some assumptions into the spreadsheets which I had no time to clarify fully with those persons who kindly had supplied data. In order to avoid any embarrassment, I have, therefore, not included any country names in these explanations. As it is cumbersome for some readers of mailing lists if there are files attached, I send this mail also without the three Models mentioned above – but I am prepared to send an attached Excel file to any member of this mailing list who requests to receive it (just send e-mail to norbert@forum.org.kh saying "request ccTLD funding models" or something like that). To some members of the mailing list I am sending the Excel file attachment at the same time with this posting, so that they may comment and say if these mathematical exercises towards a more equitable and, I think, just sharing of economic resources are useful or not. Norbert Klein Open Forum of Cambodia Former administrator of the .kh TLD Member of the Non-Commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency -- ccTLD Constituency of the DNSO Discussion Mailing List (Formerly wwtld@ripe.net) |